{"id":1275,"date":"2015-08-23T14:33:24","date_gmt":"2015-08-23T20:33:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bendreth.com\/?p=1275"},"modified":"2015-08-23T14:33:24","modified_gmt":"2015-08-23T20:33:24","slug":"we-had-to-burn-the-awards-in-order-to-save-them","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/?p=1275","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;We had to burn the awards in order to save them&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So, the 2015 Hugos have been awarded, and it&#8217;s now obvious that the in-group that has controlled the awards for a number of years felt that it was <a href=\"https:\/\/chaoshorizon.wordpress.com\/2015\/08\/23\/2015-hugo-stats-initial-analysis\/\">better not to make awards than to let the wrong people (or those supported by the wrong people) win<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I didn&#8217;t vote in every category &#8211; I won&#8217;t vote if I&#8217;m not conversant with the nominees. I feel that it&#8217;s a matter of integrity not to vote for or against things I haven&#8217;t read or watched. Given that half or more of the votes in categories dominated by Puppy nominees were for &#8220;no award&#8221; and a number of people stated that they were going to vote that way <em>without<\/em> reading any of the nominated works, it&#8217;s obvious that many people don&#8217;t believe the same way. I&#8217;d be very interested in seeing how many of the &#8220;no award&#8221; votes <em>had only<\/em> no award votes, and how many of them cast votes ranking nominees in one or more categories. <\/p>\n<p>I watched the first two hours of the livestream, although I missed the opening skit. I must say, I was disappointed but not surprised by the sniggering about the asterisk being the official emblem of this year&#8217;s Hugo awards, David Gerrold&#8217;s little &#8220;happy dance&#8221; when the audience cheered that &#8220;no award&#8221; won in the Best Related Work category, and winner speeches that included statements that &#8220;Black lives matter&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;d like to thank The Patriarchy.&#8221; I went to bed around that time, but Mr. Gerrold apparently said at some later time in the ceremony that while cheering &#8220;no award&#8221; was acceptable, booing it was not.<\/p>\n<p>As I said, I was disappointed but not surprised &#8211; this is the sort of thing I&#8217;ve come to expect from organized fandom. It&#8217;s a major reason why I&#8217;ve not been active in local fandom for a number of years, although <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldwidewords.org\/weirdwords\/ww-gaf1.htm\">whether I gafiated or fafiated depends on your point of view<\/a>. I&#8217;ve talked about this before, but apparently only in comments on other websites. There is a widespread presumption in fandom that everyone in fandom is at least liberal, if not further to the left, and the people who aren&#8217;t are stupid, evil, or worse, and are certainly not due any consideration or politeness.<\/p>\n<p>It leads to an environment in which people feel comfortable making statements denigrating conservatives, conservative ideas, and Republicans. The &#8220;logic&#8221; seems to be, &#8220;These are my views, and I&#8217;m smart, therefore I&#8217;m right, and anyone who disagrees is both stupid and incorrect, but there&#8217;s nobody here like that, right?&#8221; I don&#8217;t like arguing, so I prefer not to go places where I get stressed, but it&#8217;s been pointed out that abdicating the field in that way is the sort of thing that helped allow the SJW takeover of the field.<\/p>\n<p>Getting back to the Hugos, it also leads to the way the Puppy nominees and backers have been characterized by the gatekeepers. I&#8217;ve never met Larry Correia and Vox Day, but I have met Sarah Hoyt, and the widespread characterization of them and the Puppy nominees as being &#8220;straight white males writing about straight white males&#8221; can only be considered accurate if you say that the anti-Puppy forces are allowed to assign sex and ethnicity regardless of biology or consistency.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll admit that, while I really liked and was impressed by many of the Puppy nominees, I don&#8217;t consider all of them to have been Hugo-worthy. However, even the worst of them was better than some of last year&#8217;s highly-touted nominees (&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.apex-magazine.com\/if-you-were-a-dinosaur-my-love\/\">If You Were Attacked by Cardboard Stereotypes, My Love<\/a>,&#8221; for example).<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve looked at a few of the Hugo <a href=\"http:\/\/accordingtohoyt.com\/2015\/08\/23\/burning-down-the-field-in-order-to-save-it\/\">roundup<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/monsterhunternation.com\/2015\/08\/23\/my-official-statement-about-the-hugos\/\">response<\/a> posts, and over <a href=\"http:\/\/www.voxday.blogspot.com\/2015\/08\/hugo-2015-results.html\">at Vox Day&#8217;s site<\/a>, some commenters are blaming the Puppy voters for voting &#8220;no award,&#8221; which is ridiculous to those who&#8217;ve been following what he and others have said. Basically, this year they played it straight; <em>next<\/em> year they&#8217;ll vote to burn down the awards, since the people afraid of the awards going to the wrong people have led the way. As Vox Day pointed out, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thehugoawards.org\/2015\/08\/2014-hugo-award-winners-announced\/\">the official announcement<\/a> didn&#8217;t even mention the categories in which no award was made.<\/p>\n<p>There were five categories in which no award was made this year. That matches the number of &#8220;no awards&#8221; in all of the prior history of the Hugos. Personally, I don&#8217;t believe that the nominees this year were that incredibly and historically bad. The gatekeepers have shown the extent to which they&#8217;re willing to go to keep control of the awards. It will be interesting, and likely disheartening, to see what happens next.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So, the 2015 Hugos have been awarded, and it&#8217;s now obvious that the in-group that has controlled the awards for a number of years felt that it was better not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1275","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-reading"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1275","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1275"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1275\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1277,"href":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1275\/revisions\/1277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1275"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1275"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bendreth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1275"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}